VIKRAM SINGH GROVER,CHANDIGARH V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 (1) CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

ITA 608/CHANDI/2025

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Vikram Singh Grover against the order of the CIT(A), which dismissed his appeal as non-maintainable due to a delay of 517 days in filing the appeal against an intimation under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning denial of HRA exemption. The Tribunal found that while the delay was significant, the issues should be adjudicated on merits unless there is a deliberate defiance or abuse of process. The Tribunal noted the assessee's negligence but decided to give one final opportunity to present the case, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and discourage casual approaches in the future.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 840917 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 25-04-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RANJIT KAUR
• Keywords: Condonation of delay; Set aside

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,चǷीगढ़ Ɋायपीठ “बी” , चǷीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE ŵी लिलत क ुमार, Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी मनोज क ुमार अŤवाल, लेखा सद˟ BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JM & SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 608/Chd/ 2025 िनधाŊरण वषŊ / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Vikram Singh Grover House No. 171, Sector 8A Chandigarh, Haryana-134101 बनाम The DCIT Circle 1(1), Chandigarh ˕ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AEGPG9429R अपीलाथŎ/Appellant ŮȑथŎ/Respondent िनधाŊįरती की ओर से/Assessee by : None (Adj. Application) राजˢ की ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 25/02/2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 25/02/2026 आदेश/Order PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: This appeal is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT, Appeal, Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Visakhapatnam passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, wherein the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine on the ground that the appeal was filed belatedly by 517 days and the delay was not condoned u/s 249(3) of the Act. 2. Brief facts are that an intimation u/s 143(1) dated 19.10.2021 was issued making adjustment relating to denial of HRA exemption and consequent demand was raised. 3. The assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) on 19.04.2023 along with a petition for condonation of delay explaining that the intimation remained unnoticed and the assessee was pursuing rectification proceedings u/s 154. The learned CIT(A), however, held that the reasons did not constitute Printed from counselvise.com 2 sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable without adjudicating the issues on merits. 4. Against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee preferred in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. During the course of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee however an adjournment application has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. 6. Per contra, the Ld. DR relied upon the order of the CIT(A), however fairly submitted that appropriate directions may be issued by the Tribunal. 7. We have heard rival submissions and perused the record. It is an undisputed fact that the appeal was dismissed at threshold without examination of merits. The appellate proceedings are continuation of assessment proceedings and ordinarily disputes should be adjudicated on merits unless there is deliberate defiance or abuse of process. 7.1 At the same time, the conduct of the assessee shows clear negligence in approaching the appellate authority after an inordinate delay of 517 days. Such casual approach cannot be approved and deserves to be discouraged. Therefore, the interest of justice would be served if the assessee is granted one final opportunity subject to payment of cost and compliance of statutory conditions. 7.2 Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice, we set aside the impugned order of the CIT(A) and restore the matter to his file for fresh adjudication subject to the following conditions: (i) The assessee shall deposit cost of Rs.10,000/- in favour of the Income Tax Department within 30 days from receipt of this order and produce proof before the CIT(A). Printed from counselvise.com 3 (ii) The assessee shall comply with the mandatory conditions prescribed under section 249 of the Income-tax Act, including the prerequisite requirement of payment of taxes due on returned income / admitted tax liability as contemplated under section 249(4) before the appeal is admitted and heard. (iii) In case of non-compliance of the above conditions, the CIT(A) shall be at liberty to dismiss the appeal in accordance with law. 7.3 Upon compliance, the learned CIT(A) shall provide adequate opportunity of hearing and decide the appeal on merits by a speaking order in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to cooperate in the proceedings and not seek unnecessary adjournments. 8. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 25/02/2026 Sd/- Sd/- मनोज क ुमार अŤवाल लिलत क ुमार (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (LALIET KUMAR) लेखा सद˟/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ɋाियक सद˟ /JUDICIAL MEMBER AG आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथŎ/ The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयुƅ/ CIT 4. आयकर आयुƅ (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, चǷीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाडŊ फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar Printed from counselvise.com "