KAVITHA RAJAGOPALPRAKASH KANT

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Services
Consultation
Templates
Notice Board
Plans

Categories

Direct Tax

Indirect Tax

Corporate Law

Quick links

Services
Consultation
Templates
Notice Board
Plans

Direct Tax

|

Judgements
Blogs
Judges
Notice Board
Briefcase AI

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com

+91 97234 00220

Direct Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Indirect Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Corporate Law

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Other Links

Services
Consultation
Templates
Terms and Conditions

Contact Us
Support
About Us
Privacy Policy
Refund Policy
Delivery Policy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Crafted Mindfully at

© Copyright Adviselo Collab Studios Private Limited © 2026 All rights Reserved.

direct tax
/
judges
/
kavitha rajagopalprakash kant accountant member

KAVITHA RAJAGOPALPRAKASH KANT

Total Cases in our repository: 3

Filters

Clear all

Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

3

Court

TRIBUNAL

3

Assessment Year

2020-2021

1

2013-2014

1

2012-2013

1

Bench

Mumbai

2

Bench with Courts

Mumbai - Tribunal

2

Keywords

Opportunity of being heard

3

Principle of natural justice

3

Procedural lapse

3

Bonafide belief

2

Competent authority

2

Condonation of delay

2

Period of limitation

2

Reasonable cause

2

Revised return

2

Right to appeal

2

Set aside

2

Time period of passing order

2

Wholly owned subsidiary

2

Non compliance

1

Reassessment proceedings

1

Result in favour of

Assessee

2

Partly Allowed

1

Sections

143(3)

3

115JB

2

234B

2

43B

2

54

2

142(1)

1

148

1

Year Of Pronouncement

2026

3

Judge With Court

Kavitha Rajagopalprakash Kant - Tribunal

3

Sort By

Showing results 1-3 out of top 3 results

M/S. NAM TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI V. DCIT-14(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 3108/MUM/2025

2012-2013

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Assessee

-

Opportunity of being heardreassessment proceedingsPrinciple of natural justiceNon complianceProcedural lapse

148143(3)142(1)

6

NOBEL BIOCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI V. ACIT, CIRCLE 15(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6880/MUM/2025

2013-2014

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

Condonation of delay Set asideOpportunity of being heardRevised returnreasonable causeBonafide beliefPeriod of limitationPrinciple of natural justiceCompetent authoritywholly owned subsidiary+3 More

143(3)54 234B43B115JB

8

NOBEL BIOCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI V. ACIT, 15(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6881/MUM/2025

2020-2021

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Partly Allowed

Mumbai

Condonation of delay Set asideOpportunity of being heardRevised returnreasonable causeBonafide beliefPeriod of limitationPrinciple of natural justiceCompetent authoritywholly owned subsidiary+3 More

143(3)54 234B43B115JB

7

Previous
1
Next