IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA SMC BENCH, KOLKATA [BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER] I.T.A. NO. 1405/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 BHARAT VISION LIMITED........................................................................................................APPELLANT [PAN: AADCB 9419 N] VS. ITO, WARD-5(3), KOLKATA........................................................................RESPONDENT APPEARANCES BY: NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. SH. DHRUBAJYOTI RAY, JCIT, SR. DR, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE. DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : NOVEMBER 06 TH , 2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : NOVEMBER 27 TH , 2019 ORDER PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM :- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, KOLKATA [CIT(A) FOR SHORT] DATED 15.01.2019 U/S 250 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT FOR SHORT) FOR THE AY 2013-14. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THERE IS NO PETITION FILED FOR ADJOURNMENT EITHER. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, I DISPOSE OFF THE CASE EX-PARTE QUA THE ASSESSEE. 3. I FIND THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS PASSED AN EX-PARTE ORDER. THE APPEAL HAS NOT BEEN DISPOSED OFF ON MERITS. THIS IS NOT PERMISSIBLE IN LAW. HENCE, I RESTORE THE MATTER TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A) FOR FRESH ADJUDICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AFTER GIVING THE ASSESSEE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. KOLKATA, THE 27 TH NOVEMBER, 2019. SD/- SD/- [ABY T. VARKEY] [J. SUDHAKAR REDDY] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 27.11.2019 BIDHAN 2 I.T.A. NO. 1405/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 BHARAT VISION LIMITED. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. BHARAT VISION LIMITED, 5/4, CLIVE ROW, 2 ND FLOOR, ROOM NO. 33A, KOLKATA-700 001. 2. ITO, WARD-5(3), KOLKATA. 3. CIT(A)-2, KOLKATA. (SENT THROUGH E-MAIL) 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. (SENT THROUGH E-MAIL) TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKATA BENCHES