Hari Ram Sat Naryan Educational and Welfare Society, New Delhi V. DIT (E), New Delhi

ITA 1425/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3781 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-06-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2010
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 01-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: MONA MOHANTY
• Section: 80G

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1425/DEL/2010 HARI RAM SAT NARAYAN EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY, H-9, KANWAR SINGH NAGAR, NAJAFGARH ROAD, NANGLA, NEW DELHI VS. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI PAN: AAAAH4111N APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : RESPONDENT BY : SMT MONA MOHANTY, SR. DR O R D E R PER: C.L. SETHI, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2010 PASSED BY THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME T AX (EXEMPTIONS), REJECTING THE ASSESSEES APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION U/S. 80G OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT). 2. IN THE COURSE OF HEARING OF THIS APPEAL, THE ASS ESSEE HAS SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION WITHDRAWING THE APPEAL BY GIVING THE FO LLOWING REASONS:- WE HAVE TO STATE THAT, WE HAVE FILED THE APPEAL WI TH NEW DELHI C BENCH, AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE DIT (E) VIDE APPEAL NO.: 1425/DEL-2010 RECEIPTED ON 01/04/2010. THE HEARING IN THIS FIXED FOR 02/06/2010. SINCE, WE FILED FRESH APPLICATION ON 02/02/2010 WIT H DIT(E), WHO HAS GRANTED THE APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, VIDE ORDER N O:- ITA NO. 1425/DEL/2010 PAGE 2 OF 2 NQ.DIT(E)/2010-11/DEL-HE21846-04052010/246. COPY OF ORDER IS ENCLOSED. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE, WE WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEA L FILED. 3. IN THE LIGHT OF ASSESSEES INCLINATION TO WITHDR AW THE APPEAL IN AS MUCH AS APPROVAL U/S. 80G HAS ALREADY BEEN GRANTED TO TH E ASSESSEE ON ASSESSEES FRESH APPLICATION FILED ON 02.02.2010, WE DISMISS T HE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE ON WITHDRAWAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL. 5. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT I MMEDIATELY AFTER THE HEARING WAS OVER ON 2 ND JUNE, 2010. SD/- (K.D. RANJAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SD/- (C.L. SETHI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 2 ND JUNE, 2010 *NITASHA COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, NEW DELHI. BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR S