COMPOSITE BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, MUMBAI V. ITO WARD-3(1)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 1431/MUM/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2953 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 06-03-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANDHALE BHARAT RAMCHANDRA
• Keywords: Competent authority; Condonation of delay
• Section: 201; 6; 2

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH SMC , MUMBAI BEFORE HONBLE JUSTICE P. P. BHATT, PRESIDENT AND HONBLE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS. 1333 & 1431/MUM/2020 : A.Y : 2010 - 11 COMPOSITE BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED, FLAT NO. 10, BUILDING NO. 2, PUSHPA VIHAR, COLABA, MUMBAI 400 005. PAN : AACCC6787F (APPELLANT) VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1)(3), MUMBAI. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE (LETTER DATED 31.05.2021) RESPONDENT BY : SHRI ANDHALE BHARAT RAMCHANDRA DATE OF HEARING : 04/06/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09 /06/2021 O R D E R PER BENCH : THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST ORDER OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 8, MUMBAI (IN SHORT THE CIT(A)) DATED 30.0 1.2020 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 0 - 1 1 . 2. NONE WAS PRESENT FOR THE ASSESSEE. IT IS NOTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT TO OPT FOR SOLUTION OF DISPUTE UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT OBJECT TO THE SAME. 2 ITA NO S . 1333 & 1431 /MUM/20 20 COMPOSITE BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. 3. WE NOTE THAT IN A SIMILAR SITUATION, HON'BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS IN AN APPEAL IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS ACIT VIDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2020 HELD AS UNDER : - 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO. I. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FO R THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATION ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED TAX AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. THE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17 TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ON 17 TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DISPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFFERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OR BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER SECTION 2(J) DISPUT ED TAX HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN TERMS OF SECTION 3, WHERE A DECLARANT MEANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST DATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 IN RESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 3(A - C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN CASE, WHERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS FILED BY THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELLATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE 3 ITA NO S . 1333 & 1431 /MUM/20 20 COMPOSITE BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. SHALL BE ONE - HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCULATED ON SUCH ISSUE, IN SUCH A MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE SECOND PROVISO DEALS WITH THE CASES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROVISO DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDING BEF ORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION IS AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTICULARS TO BE FURNISHED ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4. SECTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TIME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND SECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUNITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVE N LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAY ER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVIS ION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.I ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHALL PROCESS THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT AND PASS APPROPRIATE OR DERS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX (6) WEEKS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FORM. ACCORDINGLY, RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE ABOVE AND NOTING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS OPTING FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME IN THE PRESENT APPEALS, WE TREAT THE APPEALS AS DISPOSED OFF AS WITHDRAWN. 4 ITA NO S . 1333 & 1431 /MUM/20 20 COMPOSITE BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. 4 . THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY FOR RESTORATION OF APPEAL S IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE HON 'BLE HIGH COURT ORDER AS ABOVE. 5 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISPOSED OF BY TREATING THE SAME AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED UNDER RULE 34(4) OF ITAT RULES ON 9 T H JUNE, 2021. SD/ - SD/ - (SHAMIM YAHYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ) PRESIDENT MUMBAI, DATE : 9 T H JUNE, 20 21 *SSL* COPY TO : 1) THE APPELLANT 2) THE RESPONDENT 3) THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 4) THE CIT CONCERNED 5) THE D.R, SM C BENCH, MUMBAI 6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR I.T.A.T, MUMBAI