- 1 - VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K LH U;K;IHB EQACBZ ESAA IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, MUM BAI JH ,U JH ,U JH ,U JH ,U- -- - DS DSDS DS- -- - LSUH] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH LAT; XXZ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{ K LSUH] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH LAT; XXZ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K LSUH] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH LAT; XXZ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K LSUH] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH LAT; XXZ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA[;K /ITA NO. 1544/MUM/2011 FU/KKZJ.K O'KZ @ ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03 PARNAX LAB P. LTD 104/107, JOGANI INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, BUILDING NO. 8, CHUNNABHATTI, SION, MUMBAI 400 022. CUKE@ VS. DCIT CIR. 7(1), IT OFFICES, AAYAKAR BHAVAN M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI- 400 020. AABCP 4319B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VIHYKFKHZ DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY SHRI S.M. BANDI. IZR;FKHZ DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY SHRI RAVI PRAKASH VKNS'K@ VKNS'K@ VKNS'K@ VKNS'K@ ORDER PER N.K. SAINI, AM. THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DA TED 22.10.2010 OF CIT(A)- 13, MUMBAI. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS INSTRUCTIONS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND GIVE IN WRITING THAT THE APPEAL IS WITHDRAWN. LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT IF THE APPEAL IS DISM ISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. ACCORDINGLY WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 5/02/201 4 SD/- SD/- ( SANJAY GARG ) ( N.K. SAINI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI DATED 05 /02/2014 SKS SR. P.S LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING 05-02-2014 ?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05-02-2014 - 2 - COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CONCERNED CIT(A) 4. THE CONCERNED CIT 5. THE DR, C BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI