RATAN KANWAR, Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 205/JPR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5137 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-09-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 04-03-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAGHUVIR SINGH DAGUR CIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH DQY HKKJR] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 205/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12. SMT. RATAN KANWAR A209, DASHRATH MARG, HANUMAN NAGAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. ADRPK 6720 H VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI RAGHUVIR SINGH DAGUR (ADDL. CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 07.09.2016. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08/09/2016. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 18.12.2015 PERTAINING TO A.Y. 2011-12. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING TODAY I.E. 07. 09.2016. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE APPEAL WAS PASSED OVER. ON SECOND CALL, NO ONE APPEARED. FROM THE RECORDS, IT IS TRANSPIRED THAT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING ALSO NO ONE HAD APPEARED DESPITE SE RVICE OF NOTICE. IT IS TRANSPIRED THAT A DEFECT MEMO WAS ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE REQUI RING HER TO FURNISH THE ORIGINAL COPY OF CHALLAN PROVING THE PAYMENT OF REQUISITE FE E. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THE DEFECT MEMO AND ALSO DID NOT BOTHERED TO A PPEAR BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THEREFORE, IT CAN BE INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED 2 ITA NO. 205/JP/2016 SMT. RATAN KANWAR IN PROSECUTING HER APPEAL. THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE WOULD BE AT LIB ERTY TO APPROACH THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING OF THE ORDER, IF SO ADVISED. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08/09/ 2016. SD/- SD/- ( HKKXPUN ( DQY HKKJR ) ( BHAGCHAND) ( KUL BHARAT ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 08/09/2016. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SMT. RATAN KANWAR, JAIPUR. 2. THE RESPONDENT THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3( 1), JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 205/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR