IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH (BEFORE SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA NO: 2543/AHD/2012 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 11(4), AHMEDABAD V/S M/S. SYNWAVE INDUSTRIES 242, NEW CLOTH MARKET, O/S. RAIPUR GATE, RAIPUR, AHMEDABAD-380022 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN: AAUFS0675H APPELLANT BY : SHRI KEYUR PATEL, SR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI S.N. SOPARKAR, A.R. ( )/ ORDER DATE OF HEARING : 16-12-2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01-01-2016 PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS AGAINST THE ORD ER OF CIT(A)-XVI, AHMEDABAD DATED 31.08.2012 FOR A.Y. 2009-10. ITA NO . 254 3/AHD/2012 . A.Y. 2009-1 0 2 2. THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE REVENUE IN THE PRESENT AP PEAL READS AS UNDER:- 1. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DEL ETING THE ADDITION OF RS. 20,00,000/- MADE ON ACCOUNT OF UNEXPLAINED CASH CREDITS U/S. 68 OF THE ACT WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE STATEMENT RECORDED AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES. 2. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DEL ETING THE ADDITION OF RS. 6,62,959/- MADE BY DISALLOWING THE INTEREST PAI D ON UNSECURED LOANS. 3. BEFORE US, AT THE OUTSET, LD. A.R. SUBMITTED THAT T HE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE NEEDS TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.201 5. THE LD. D.R. FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. ON PERUSING THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENU E, WE FIND THAT REVENUE IS AGGRIEVED BY DELETION OF ADDITIONS OF RS. 26, 62 ,959/-, THE TAX EFFECT OF WHICH IS BELOW RS. 10 LACS. AS PER THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT) DATED 10.12.2015 (CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015), NO DEPARTMENT APPEALS ARE TO BE FILED AGAINST RELIEF G IVEN BY LD. CIT(A) BEFORE THE INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL UNLESS THE TAX EFFECT, EXCL UDING INTEREST EXCEEDS RS. 10 LACS AND IT FURTHER STATES THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO THE PENDING APPEALS. IN THE PRESENT CASE, SINCE IT IS AN UNDISPUTED FACT THAT ON THE ADDITIONS WHICH ARE IN DISPUTE THE TAX EFFECT I S LESS THAN RS. 10 LACS, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE MONETARY LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE ITA NO . 254 3/AHD/2012 . A.Y. 2009-1 0 3 DEPARTMENT AND THEREFORE THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, WE DISMIS S THE APPEAL OF REVENUE WITHOUT EXPRESSING ANY OPINION ON MERITS OF THE CAS E. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 01 - 01 - 2016. SD/- SD/- (S.S. GODARA) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: TRUE COPY RAJESH COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) 4. THE CIT CONCERNED. 5. THE DR., ITAT, AHMEDABAD. 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER DEPUTY/ASSTT.REGISTRAR ITAT,AHM EDABAD