, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD , , BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.2787/AHD/2013 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07) THE DCIT (OSD)-I, CIRCLE-4 AHMEDABAD / VS. KLOCKNER DESMA MACHINERY PVT.LTD. PRESIDENT HOUSE OPP. C.N. VIDYALAYA, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD $ ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAACK 8768 N ( $& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '($& / RESPONDENT ) $&) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI JAMES KURIAN, SR.DR '($&*) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M.J. SHAH, AR +* / DATE OF HEARING 22/08/2016 ,-./* / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 22/08/2016 / O R D E R PER SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-VIII, AHMEDABAD DATED 29/08/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. THE REVENUE HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUND OF APPEAL:- 1. THE LD.CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE PENALTY RS.3,52,698/- U/S.271(1)(C), WITHOUT PROPERLY APPRE CIATING THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE MATERIAL BROUGHT ON RECORD. ITA NO.2787/AHD /2013 THE DCIT VS. KLOCKNER DESMA MACHINERY PVT.LTD. ASST.YEAR 2006-07 - 2 - 3. BEFORE US, THE LD.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION DATED 22/08/2016 W HEREIN ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN SOUGHT AS THE LD.AR IS STATED TO HAVE CALL ED THE RELEVANT PAPERS FROM ASSESSEE. THE LD. SR.DR ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT ON THE IMPUGNED ADDITIONS IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBE D BY THE CBDT CIRCULAR OF 10/12/2015 BEARING NO. 21 OF 2015 AND T HEREFORE THE APPEAL BE DECIDED ACCORDINGLY. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID S UBMISSION BY LD.DR THE ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION IS REJECTED. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE LD.SR.DR AND PERUSED THE MATER IALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. ON PERUSING THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED B Y THE REVENUE, WE FIND THAT REVENUE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) IN RESPECT OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY HIM. AS PER THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT) DATED 10/12/2015 (CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015), NO DEPARTMENT APPEALS ARE TO BE FILED AGAINST RELIEF G IVEN BY LD. CIT(A) BEFORE THE INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL UNLESS THE TAX EFFEC T, EXCLUDING INTEREST EXCEEDS RS. 10 LACS AND IT FURTHER STATES THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO THE PENDING APPEALS. IN THE PRES ENT CASE, SINCE IT IS AN UNDISPUTED FACT THAT ON THE ADDITIONS WHICH ARE IN DISPUTE, THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS. 10 LACS AND IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY MAT ERIAL ON RECORD BY THE REVENUE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ISSUE IN THE PRESEN T APPEAL IS COVERED BY EXEMPTIONS SPECIFIED IN CLAUSE (8) OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE MONETARY LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS OF ITA NO.2787/AHD /2013 THE DCIT VS. KLOCKNER DESMA MACHINERY PVT.LTD. ASST.YEAR 2006-07 - 3 - THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THEREFORE THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, W E DISMISS THE APPEAL OF REVENUE WITHOUT EXPRESSING ANY OPINION ON MERITS OF THE CASE. HOWEVER, IN CASE THERE IS ANY ERROR IN THE COMPUTAT ION OF THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED OR IF FOR ANY REASON, THE AFORESAID CBDT C IRCULAR IS NOT APPLICABLE, IT WOULD BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK REVIVAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 22/08/2016 SD/- SD/- () () (RAJPAL YADAV) ( ANIL CHATURVEDI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 22/ 08 /2016 3..,.../ T.C. NAIR, SR. PS !'#$#! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. $& / THE APPELLANT 2. '($& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 456 7 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 7 ( ) / THE CIT(A)-VIII, AHMEDABAD 5. 89:'56 , 56/ , 4 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. :<=+ / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, (8' //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD