Kolhapur Investors Association, Kolhapur V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune, Pune

ITA 373/PUN/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2000 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-05-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2024
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 22-02-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KEYUR PATEL LD.
• Assessee Lawyers: S S GUDHATE LD.
• Section: 250

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE ITAT-Pune Page 1 of 4 BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.0373/PUN/2024 Kolhapur Investor Association Sterling Tower C-9-1, E-Ward-1031, Karvir, Kolhapur-416001 PAN: AAATK1161E .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant V/s The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune ....... प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Appearances Assessee by : Mr S S Gudhate [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr Keyur Patel [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing : 30/05/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30/05/2024 ORDER PER G. D.PADMAHSHALI, AM; By present appeal, the assessee impugned the order of rejection passed u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi)of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [for short ‘CIT(E)’] vide DIN & order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1054680018(1) dt. 27/07/2023. 2. We have heard both rival parties; and subject to provisions of rule 18 of ‘ITAT Rules’, perused material placed on record. 3. At the outset, after vouching sufficiency of reasons beyond undeliberate 151 days delay in instituting the present appeal, we in the larger interest of justice and after placing reliance on ‘Vijay Vishin Kolhapur Investor Association Vs CIT(E) ITA No. 373/PUN/2024 ITAT-Pune Page 2 of 4 Meghani Vs. DCIT & Anr’ reported 398 ITR 250 (Bom) and ‘Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Anr. Vs Ms Katiji and Others’ reported at 167 ITR 5 (SC), deem it fit to condone the same as ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 4. We note that, the appellant vide Form No. 10AB dt. 10/02/2023 filed an application to the respondent under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act thereby seeking regular/final registration u/s 12AB of the Act. The appellant’s failure to annexe required documents as contemplated u/r 17A(2)(k) of IT-Rules, the Ld. CIT(E) by notice dt. 19/05/2023 accorded an opportunity to make good the deficiency of the application, the assessee supplied requisite documents. In the event of failure on the part of assessee to comply with the requirement one more opportunity was granted vide separate notice dt. 10/07/2023; however this notice was even remain unattended. 5. In absence of requisite documents, the Ld. CIT(E) was constrained to reject to grant regular registration and cancel the provisional registration granted to appellant on 20/02/2022 u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act as he could not draw any satisfactory conclusion about genuineness of activities of the appellant and satisfaction over compliance of requirements of any other law for the time being in force as are material for the purpose of achieving its stated objective of the appellant. Kolhapur Investor Association Vs CIT(E) ITA No. 373/PUN/2024 ITAT-Pune Page 3 of 4 6. We note that, the statue empowers the registering authority to call any such documents or information so as to satisfy himself with twin prescriptions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Act viz; (A) genuineness of activities (B) Compliance with all applicable laws etc., and in order to draw conclusion over satisfaction the registering authority is duty bond to carry out wholesome & autonomous exercise according to nature/character of charitable purpose vis-a-vis the applicant engaged into. In arriving to conclusion over satisfaction about the genuineness of activities and compliance of applicable law, the registration proceedings is expected to vouch predominantly; (i) whether applicant is a public charitable trust established in accordance with applicable law & in operation as such [Constitution/Establishment] (iii) whether all the entries of object clause are in consonance with the ‘charitable purpose’ as defined by section 2(15) of the Act [Objects] (iv) whether there exist any implied or express provision in the constitutional & other administrative documents/policies etc., entitling any right or power to the trust/trustee carry to engage (by itself or through agent/appointees) into any activities outside the ambit of registered objects [Rights/Power] (vi) whether all the activities and operation are strictly carried out in line with the registered objects of ‘charitable in nature’ [Activity] and finally (vii) whether it is compliant of all the applicable law in all respect and around the clock[Compliance]. Any proceedings culminated without vouching Kolhapur Investor Association Vs CIT(E) ITA No. 373/PUN/2024 ITAT-Pune Page 4 of 4 these former key factual (Corac) would prima-facie be deficient as it may lead to absurd conclusion. 7. We find that, owning to absence of evidential documents and failure on the part of appellant to cure notified deficiencies constrained the Ld. CIT(E) to culminate the impugned registration proceedings without former wholesome & autonomous exercise. However, the reasons behind non-compliance as explained in each of these cases in our considered view are sufficient for setting aside the rejection and remitting these matters back to the file of registering authority for de-nova consideration which the Ld. DR could hardly object. 8. In view hereof, without commenting on merits we set-aside the impugned rejection and cancellation of provisional registration, and consequently remit the matters back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for de-nova consideration in accordance with law after giving two effective opportunities to the appellant assessee. 9. The appeal in result is ALLOWED FOR STATISTCIAL PURPOSES. U/r 34 of ITAT Rules, order pronounced in open court on this Thursday 30 th day of May, 2024. -S/d- -S/d- S. S. GODARA G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / PUNE; दिन ांक / Dated : 30 th day of May, 2024. आदेशकीप्रतितितिअग्रेतिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The Pr.CIT(Exemption),Pune 4. The CIT-Concerned(MH-India) 5. DR, ITAT, Pune Bench ‘A’, Pune 6.ग र्डफ़ इल / Guard File. आिेश नुस र / By Order वररष्ठदनजीसदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकरअपीलीयन्य य दिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.