Ritesh Ranjan Singh, Patna V. ADDl.CIT, Range-5, Patna

ITA 41/PAT/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0494 (ITAT-PATNA)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 3 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-06-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 05-03-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.20/Pat/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Saket Synthetics.......................................................................................Appellant Sutapatti, Muzaffarpur-842001. [PAN: AAVFS7957B] vs. PCIT, Muzaffarpur...........................................................................Respondent Appearances by: Shri Jai Prakash Agrawal, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent. I.T.A. No.02/Pat/2017 Assessment Year: 2016-17 International Institute of Sulabh System................................................Appellant 21, Vaibhav Apartment, Budhmarg, Patna-800001. [PAN: AAATI1439B] vs. CIT, Exemption, Patna........................................................................Respondent Appearances by: Shri K. M. Mishra, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent. I.T.A. Nos.40&41/Pat/2018 Assessment Years: 2008-09 & 2009-10 Ritesh Ranjan Singh..........................................................................Appellant R.T. Bhawan, Punaichak, Patna-800023. [PAN: ANUPS2578N] vs. ACIT, Range-5, Patna..........................................................................Respondent Appearances by: Shri Abhi Sarkar, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : June 06, 2022 Date of pronouncing the order : June 06, 2022 I.T.A. No.20/Pat/2018 I.T.A. No.02/Pat/2017 I.T.A. Nos.40&41/Pat/2018 2 ORDER Per Bench: All the captioned appeals have been preferred by the different assessees against the separate orders dated 28.12.2017, 26.10.2016, 11.10.2017 & 28.12.2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT’] respectively. 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsels for the assessees have stated at Bar that as per the instructions of their clients, they may be allowed to withdraw all the captioned appeals filed by the different assessees. 3. In view of this, all the appeals of the assessees are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Kolkata, the 6 th June, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated:06.06.2022. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. (i) Saket Synthetics (ii) International Institute of Sulabh System (iii) Ritesh Ranjan Singh 2. (i) PCIT, Muzaffarpur (ii) CIT, Exemption, Patna (iii) ACIT, Range-5, Patna 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), //True copy// By order Assistant Registrar, Kolkata Benches I.T.A. No.20/Pat/2018 I.T.A. No.02/Pat/2017 I.T.A. Nos.40&41/Pat/2018 3