DOUZI SHUJATHALIKHAN, KADAPA V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 , KADAPA

ITA 560/Hyd/2023

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5098 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-11-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2023
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 14-11-2023
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Additional evidence

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “SMC”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 560/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Douzi Shujathalikhan, Kadapa [PAN No. AKHPD5218N] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kadapa अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee by: Smt. S. Sandhya, AR रधजस्‍व द्वधरध/Revenue by: Shri P.V. Subba Raju, DR स ु िवधई की तधरीख/Date of hearing: 29/11/2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement on: 29/11/2023 आदेश / ORDER Aggrieved by the order dated 13/10/2022 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”), in the case of Douzi Shujathalikhan (“the assessee”) for the assessment year 2017-18, assessee preferred this appeal. ITA No. 560/Hyd/2023 Page 2 of 4 2. At the outset regarding condonation of delay, it is submitted by the learned AR that at the time of assessment proceedings, the assessee was reeling under severe sickness and soon after passing of the assessment order, he met with an accident undergoing somuch of turmoil and ultimately slipped into dementia. Learned AR further submitted that there was a considerable delay in filing the first appeal before the learned CIT(A) and likewise, there is delay in filing this appeal before the Tribunal also. 3. On a careful perusal of the medical certificate supported by other documents, I am convinced that there is sufficient cause in preferring the appeal with delay and the same cause equally applies for non-participation of the assessee in the assessment as well as the first appellate proceedings. Now, so much of material is produced on behalf of the assessee in the shape of additional evidence, submitting that though the assessee had sufficient cause to defend the assessment and addition, due to the sickness and subsequent accident, causing dementia to the assessee, the case of the assessee could not be prosecuted diligently. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case in their entirety and analysed in the light of the additional evidence, I am inclined to accept the additional evidence and deem it just and necessary to set aside the impugned order and restore the issue to the file of learned Assessing Officer to decide the same on the merits with reference to the material now produced and after affording an opportunity to the assessee afresh. It is also made clear that this is the last opportunity being given to the assessee and no further lenience will be taken. ITA No. 560/Hyd/2023 Page 3 of 4 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this the 29 th day of November, 2023. Sd/- (K. NARASIMHA CHARY) JUDICIAL MEMBER Hyderabad, Dated: 29/11/2023 TNMM ITA No. 560/Hyd/2023 Page 4 of 4 Copy forwarded to: 1. Douzi Shujathalikhan, 11/225 2, Ammenpeer Road, Kadapa. 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kadapa. 3. Pr.CIT, 4. DR, ITAT, Hyderabad. 5. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, HYDERABAD