Shri Sanjay Gopal Bichu, Belgaum V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(2), Belgaum

ITA 58/PAN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9874 (ITAT-PANAJI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 02-02-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI (AT E - COURT, PUNE) BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, J UDICIAL M EMBER . / I TA NO. 58 /P A N/ 2018 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010 - 11 SHRI SANJAY GOPAL BICHU, 204, MAHALAXMI APARTMENT, COLLEGE ROAD, BELGAUM - 590 001 PAN : ACNPB9307L ....... / APPELLANT / V/S. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2), BELGAUM / RESPONDENT A SSESSEE BY : SHRI PRAMOD Y. VAIDYA REVENUE BY : SHRI DINESH A. CHAURASIA / DATE OF HEARING : 1 2 . 03 .202 1 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16 . 03 .2021 / ORDER THIS APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(APPEALS), GULBARGA DATED 24.11.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010 - 11 AS PER THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL ON RECORD. 2. THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME , 2 ITA NO. 58 /P A N/ 2018 A.Y. 2010 - 11 2020 AND HAS FILED AN APPLICATION DATED 23.02 .2021 ALONG WITH FORM - 3 BY STATING AS FOLLOWS : ITA NO. 58/PAN/2018 AY 2010 - 11 1 . THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS PENDING BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE BENCH. 2 . THAT THE APPELLANT HAS ALREADY APPLIED FOR DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 (DTVSV) FOR SETTLEMENT OF APPEAL. PLEASE, FIND ENCLOSED HEREWITH COPY OF FORM 1, FORM - 2 AND FORM 3 IN THIS REGARD. 3 . UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES APPELLANT MAKES THIS APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE BENCH OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. 3. THE LD. DR HAS NO O BJECTION IN CASE THE ASSESSEE WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. HENCE, WE PERMIT THE WITHDRAWAL. APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED BEING WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT , THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRO NOUNCED ON 16 TH D AY OF MARCH, 2021. SD/ - SD/ - INTURI RAMA RAO PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE; / DATED : 16 TH MARCH , 202 1 SB / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT. 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS), G ULBARGA . 4. THE PR. CIT , BEL A GAVI. 5 . , , / DR, ITAT, PANAJI . 6 . / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // / PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE. 3 ITA NO. 58 /P A N/ 2018 A.Y. 2010 - 11 DATE 1 DRAFT DICTATED ON 12 . 0 3 .202 1 SR.PS/PS 2 DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 12 . 03 .202 1 SR.PS/PS 3 DRAFT PROPOSED AND PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM/AM 4 DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER AM/JM 5 APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS SR.PS/PS 6 KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON SR.PS/PS 7 DATE OF UPLOADING OF ORDER SR.PS/PS 8 FILE SENT TO BENCH CLERK SR.PS/PS 9 DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 10 DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE A.R 11 DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER