SHRI SUMER MAL JALAN, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-2, JAIPUR

ITA 702/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5186 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-01-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 22-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL CIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 702/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 SHRI SUMER MAL JALAN, F-109, SHIV SHAKTI PARADISE, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O. WARD-4(2) JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ACBPJ 6011 F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MAHENDRA GARGIEYA (ADV) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 21/01/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28/01/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2, JAIPUR DATED 12/03/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2009-10. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOVE APPEAL PLEASE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT INASMUCH AS THE ITA 702/JP/2018_ SUMER MAL JALAN VS ITO 2 ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A FORMAL ORDER, TO THIS EFFECT MAY KINDLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU SINCERELY YOURS, FOR MAHENDRA GARGIEYA & ASSOCIATES ADVOCATE & TAX CONSULTANTS 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 28/01/2021 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI SUMER MAL JALAN, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 4(2), JAIPUR. ITA 702/JP/2018_ SUMER MAL JALAN VS ITO 3 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 702/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR