Jayaraman Srinivasa sastry, CHENNAI V. ACIT, CHENNAI

ITA 74/CHNY/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8114 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 9 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-11-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 03-11-2016
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 14-01-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUPRIO PAL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , B B ENCH, CHENNAI . , ' # . $ , & ' BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICI AL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.74/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12) MR.JAYARAMAN SRINIVASA SASTRY, OLD NO.20, NEW NO.4, ANNASWAMY STREET, PALLAVARAM, CHENNAI-600 043. VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE-23(1) CHENNAI-34. PAN: AACPJ0796Q ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MR. SUPRIO PAL, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 3 RD NOVEMBER,2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 3 RD NOVEMBER, 2016 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1 0, CHENNAI DATED 31.08.2015 IN ITA NO.20/2014-15-CIT(A)-10 PASSED UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S. 250(6) OF THE ACT. 2. INITIALLY, THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 28.03.2016, HOWEVER THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE LEARNE D AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TO 23.05.2016, 31.05.2016 & 03.08.20 16. THE LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AGAIN SOUGHT FOR ADJOURNM ENT ON 03.08.2016, HENCE THE CASE WAS POSTED FOR HEARING O N 03.11.2016. HOWEVER ON 03.11.2016, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF T HE ASSESSEE, NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. 2 ITA NO.74 /MDS/2016 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 I TD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAOHOLKAR (223 ITR 480), WE HEREBY DISMI SS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 3 RD NOVEMBER, 2016 SD/- SD/- ( ' # . $ ) ( . ) ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) # % / JUDICIAL MEMBER % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER # /CHENNAI, ( /DATED 3 RD NOVEMBER, 2016 SOMU *+ ,+ /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. + 1 /DR 6. /GF