NEETA VIJAY MIRCHANDANI, MUMBAI V. DY CIT CC 7 (4), MUMBAI

ITA 7786/MUM/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9965 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-01-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 17-12-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SANJAY SETHI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, M UMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM ITA NOS. ASSESSMENT YEAR APPELLANT RESPONDENT 7786/MUM/2019 2011-12 NEETA VIJAY MIRCHANDANI 505, SHALIMAR MORYA PARK, BEHIND MORYA ESTATE, NEW LINK ROAD, ANDHERI (W), MUMBAI 400 058 [PAN. APOPM 7237 C] DY. CIT, CIRCLE-7(4), AAYKAR BHAVAN, 6 TH FLOOR, NEW MARINE LINES, CHURCHGATE-400 020 854/MUM/2020 2010-11 VIJAY TUBE CORPORATION 93A, NAGDEVI STREET, MUMBAI-400 003 [PAN : AAAFV 3088 K] CIT, RANGE-17(3)(5) KAUTILYA BHAWAN, MUMBAI-400 051 855/MUM/2020 2011-12 VIJAY TUBE CORPORATION 93A, NAGDEVI STREET, MUMBAI-400 003 [PAN : AAAFV 3088 K] CIT, RANGE-17(3)(5) KAUTILYA BHAWAN, MUMBAI-400 051 7444/MUM/2019 2011-12 PARTH RAHUL TIMBADIA 601/701, CRYSTAL APT., PLOT NO.31, JVPD SCHEME, N.S. ROAD, VILE PARLE (W), MUMBAI-400 056 [PAN: ADNPT 5421 G] ITO-25(3)(2), MUMBAI 7804/MUM/2019 2012-13 SHRI NARESH KASHIPRASAD SONTH ALIA 134, SHIV SHAKTI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, M.V. ROAD, ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI-400 012 [PAN: AANPS 7775 D] ITO-24(3)(1) MUMBAI 7485/MUM/2018 2006-07 INVITATION INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. 569, FIFTH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400 020 [PAN: AAACI 0037 N] ITO-4(2)(3), MUMBAI APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SANJAY SETHI DATE OF HEARING : 23.12.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01.01.2021 O R D E R PER SHAMIM YAHYA, A. M.: THESE ARE APPEALS BY THE DIFFERENT ASSESSEES AGAIN ST THE RESPECTIVE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), PERTA INING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR AS MENTIONED ABOVE. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IN THESE CASES THE ASSESSEE HAS S UBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWA S SCHEME 2020. HENCE, THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT HE SHALL BE WITHDRAWING THE APPE AL. 2 ITA NO. 7786/MUM/2019 AND OTHERS 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THIS PROPOSITION. 4. UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, I HAVE GRANTED PERMI SSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THESE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRA WN. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED UNDER RULE 34(4) OF THE INCOME TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1962, BY PLACING THE DETAILS ON THE NOTICE BOARD ON 01.01 .2021 SD/- (SHAMIM YAHYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED : 01.01.2021 ROSHANI , SR. PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. CIT - CONCERNED 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER, (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI