SHRI BABU LAL AGARWAL, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-2, JAIPUR

ITA 994/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5463 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 1 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-10-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 29-08-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHANCHAL MEENA CIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 994/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 BABU LAL AGARWAL, 298/12, SECTOR-3, VIDHYADHAR NAGAR, JAIPUR (RAJASTHAN)-302023. CUKE VS. ITO, WARD 4(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABHPA 4265 D VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : MAHENDRA GARGIEYA (ADV.) VSVY (WITHDRAWAL) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : MS. CHANCHAL MEENA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 01/10/2020 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01/10/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2, JAIPUR DATED 18/06/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOVE APPEAL PLEASE ITA 994/JP/2018_ BABU LAL AGARWAL VS ITO 2 BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT INASMUCH AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020. A FORMAL ORDER, TO THIS EFFECT MAY KINDLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU SINCERELY YOURS, FOR MAHENDRA GARGIEYA & ASSOCIATES. ADVOCATES & TAX CONSULTANTS (ADV. MAHENDRA GARGIEYA, AR) 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEES TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01 ST OCTOBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 01/10/2020 ITA 994/JP/2018_ BABU LAL AGARWAL VS ITO 3 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI BABU LAL AGARWAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD 4(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 994/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR