IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM ./IT(SS)A NOS.267 TO 270/AHD/2015 ( [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEARS: (2007-08 TO 2010-11) (VIRTUAL COURT HEARING) M/S. RIJIYA BROTHERS, 20/21, NISHAL FALIA, GOTALWADI, KATARGAM, SURAT -395006. VS. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, SURAT. ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO.: AADFR4197A (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MEHUL K. PATEL, AR RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RITESH MISHRA, CIT(DR) / DATE OF HEARING : 09/02/2021 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09/02/2021 / O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, SHRI MEHUL K. PATEL, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, SUBMITTED BEFORE THE BENCH THAT ASSESSEE HAS OPTED THE BENEFIT OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 . SHRI MEHUL K. PATEL, LEARNED COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, BY WAY OF A LETTER DATED 29.12.2020, SUBMITTED THAT ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS TO WHICH, THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION. 2. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND GONE THROUGH REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE AND NOTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS. THE LD. DR FOR THE REVENUE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION IF THE SAID APPEALS ARE WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. CONSEQUENTLY, WE TREAT THESE APPEALS AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ( IN IT(SS)A NOS. 267 TO 270 FOR AY. 2007-08 TO 2010-11 ) ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. PAGE | 2 IT(SS)A 267 TO 270/AHD/2015 AYS: 2007-08 TO 2010-11 M/S. RIJIYA BROTHERS ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 09/02/2021 AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL COURT HEARING. SD/- SD/- (PAWAN SINGH) (DR. A.L. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER LWJR /SURAT / DATE: 09/02/2021 SAMANTA, PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. PR.CIT 5. DR/AR, ITAT, SURAT 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/SR. PS/PS ITAT, SURAT