M/S. VYASA SANKARAPARIPOORNA SAYEE,TIRUNELVELI V. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

ITA 3519/CHNY/2025

AI Insights

The case involves M/s. Vyasa Sankaraparipoorna Sayee Dhatathreya Vidya Trust, a trust established for medical relief, education, and aiding the poor, which sought approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai, rejected the trust's application for approval, citing incorrect selection of the sub-clause under section 80G, delay in filing, and the religious nature of the trust's activities. The trust appealed against this decision, arguing that the correct sub-clause was selected and that the rejection was premature without adequate opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice. The Tribunal agreed with the trust's position and remanded the case for a fresh evaluation.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 834063 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 27-11-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: V SREENIVASAN
• Assessee Lawyers: LAVANYA
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard
• Section: 80G

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, ‘डी’ Ûयायपीठ, चेÛनई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI Įी इंटूरȣ रामा राव, लेखा सदèय एवं ᮰ी एस एस िव᳡नेᮢ रिव, ᭠याियक सद᭭य क े सम¢ BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 3519/CHNY/2025 M/s. Vyasa Sankaraparipoorna Sayee Dhatathreya Vidya Trust, No.47 A, Parpakulam Maharajnagar, Krishnapuram, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli – 627 002. PAN: AAATV 8037A Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai. (अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant) (ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent) अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Appellant by : Ms. Lavanya, CA ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Respondent by : Shri AR V Sreenivasan, CIT सुनवाई कᳱ तारीख/Date of Hearing : 20.01.2026 घोषणा कᳱ तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 05.02.2026 आदेश/ O R D E R PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai dated 18.09.2025 rejecting Form No.10AB filed for seeking approval u/s.80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’). Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.3519/Chny/2025 :- 2 -: 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee is a trust incorporated on 08.06.2004 with the object of rendering medical relief, education and helping the poor people. The assessee trust filed an application in Form No.10AB under clause (iv)B of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. On receipt of such application, the Ld.CIT(E) had called for certain information vide show-cause notice dated 15.07.2025. However, the assessee trust had failed to respond to the above show-cause notice. In the circumstances, the Ld.CIT(E) proceeded to dispose of the application by rejecting the grant of approval u/s.80G clause (iv) of the Act on the ground that assessee trust had selected wrong sub- clause of sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act, and there is a delay in filing the application and also on the ground that the activities of the trust are religious in nature. 3. Being aggrieved, the assessee trust is in appeal before us in the present appeal. The Ld.AR made submission that the Ld.CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for approval u/s.80G of the Act by holding that the assessee trust incorrectly selected the wrong sub- clause even though the assessee selected the correct sub-clause (iii) of sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. Without prejudice to the above, it is submitted that the Ld.CIT(E) ought not have Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.3519/Chny/2025 :- 3 -: rejected the application without granting sufficient time to respond to the show-cause notice. Thus, it is prayed that the matter may be remanded to the file of the CIT(E) for denova disposal of the application. 4. On the other hand, the Ld.DR opposed the above submissions and submitted that the Ld.CIT(E) has granted sufficient opportunity to the assessee. 5. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The issue that arises for our consideration is whether the CIT(E) was justified in refusing the grant of approval under clause (iv) of sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. On mere perusal of the impugned order, it would suggest that the CIT(E) had dismissed the application for seeking grant of approval u/s.80G of the Act for three reasons which are enumerated above. However, it appears from the impugned order that the CIT(E) granted only two opportunities to respond to the show-cause notice. Moreover, the application cannot be dismissed merely on the ground of technical breach of procedure and approval cannot be refused merely on the ground that the objectives of the trust are religious in nature. For these reasons, we are of the considered opinion that the matter Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.3519/Chny/2025 :- 4 -: requires to be remanded back to the Ld.CIT(E) for denova consideration of application in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 5th February, 2026 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (एस एस ͪवæवनेğ रͪव) (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) ÛयाǓयक सदèय/JUDICIAL MEMBER (इंटूरȣ रामा राव) (INTURI RAMA RAO) लेखा सदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे᳖ई/Chennai, ᳰदनांक/Dated, the 5th February, 2026 RSR आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथȸ/Appellant 2. Ĥ×यथȸ/Respondent 3. आयकर आयुÈत /CIT, Madurai 4. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध/DR 5. गाड[ फाईल/GF. Printed from counselvise.com "