IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH B, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI T.R. SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. NO.56 /CHD/2013 (IN ITA NO.1242 /CHD/2010) ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001-02 PREETI BAJAJ, VS. THE D.C.I.T., 2746/1, GURDEV NAGAR, CIRCLE VI, LUDHIANA. LUDHIANA. PAN: AFVPB6764N AND M.A. NO.57 /CHD/2013 (IN ITA NO.1243 /CHD/2010) ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001-02 NIRMAL BAJAJ, VS. THE D.C.I.T., C-62, FOCAL POINT, CIRCLE VI, PHASE V, LUDHIANA. LUDHIANA. PAN: ABJPB4766G (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AKHILESH GUPTA DATE OF HEARING : 29.11.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23.12.2013 O R D E R PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM: THE APPLICANTS HAVE FILED THESE MISCELLANEOUS APPLI CATIONS FOR RECALLING THE ORDER DATED 30.04.2013 IN ITA NOS.124 2 & 1243/CHD/2010 RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2001-02. 2. THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS WERE FIXE D FOR HEARING ON 4.10.2013 AND THEREAFTER ON 25.10.2013 AND ON NONE OF THE DATES OF HEARING THERE WAS ANY REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF T HE APPLICANTS, NOR ANY 2 APPLICATION WAS MOVED FOR ADJOURNMENT. THE BENCH HAD DIRECTED ON 25.10.2013 THAT THE MATTER WOULD BE FIXED FOR HEARI NG ON 29.11.2013 FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE AND THIS WA S THE LAST OPPORTUNITY PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANTS. HOWEVER, ON THE APPOIN TED DATED OF HEARING I.E. 29.11.2013 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE APPL ICANTS AND IT SEEMS THAT THE APPLICANTS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS AND THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICAT IONS MOVED BY THE APPLICANT ARE THUS DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIO NS FILED BY THE APPLICANT ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 23 RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013. SD/- SD/- (T.R.SOOD) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 23 RD DECEMBER, 2013 *RATI* COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT(A)/TH E CIT/THE DR. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 3